跪求大神翻译一下这段。。。
Phenotyping BatteryPatients completed preoperative phenotypingusing validated self-report measures. The primary measure of interest was the 2011 fibromyalgia surveycriteria.Thefibromyalgia survey iscomposed of the number of painful body areas assessed by using the MichiganBody Map (0 to 19) and comorbid symptoms such as fatigue, trouble thinking, andheadaches assessed by using the Symptom Severity Index (0 to 12). Hence, thetotal fibromyalgia score ranges from 0 to 31. The measure has demonstrated goodreliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Previous cutpoints have been described to categorize a person as “ fibromyalgia positive”;however, the continuous score was used for the analyses in the current study.Additional phenotyping included pain severity (Brief Pain Inventory; 0 to 10composite score using the mean of the average, least, worst, and pain rightnow; overall body pain and surgical site pain assessed separately); neuropathicpain descriptors (Pain-DETECT),anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety andDepression Scale),and catastrophizing (Coping Strategies Questionnaire).Themedication list from the preoperative records was printed and reviewed with thepatient by a research assistant. All medications administered as needed werereviewed in detail to ensure the ability to differentiate the varied patternsof opioid use (e.g., differentiating patient who uses one hydrocodone per weekfrom the person who takes three daily). The average daily opioid consumption was converted to a 24-h oralmorphine equivalent (OME) total. Opioids administered by the anesthesia teambefore and during surgery were also converted to OMEs as a covariate.Demographics, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)physical status score were collected from the electronic medical record(Centricity; General Electric Healthcare, USA). Because all patients receivedgeneral anesthesia, the anesthetic technique was not assessed.The surgical approach was recorded asvaginal, laparoscopic, robotic, or open. 大概是一篇关于纤维性肌瘤的文章。术前病人表型的获得采取病人自己汇报的方式。采取积分制，用 两种方法评价，采取积分制，相加为31分。以前采取的方法是定性式的，比如纤维性肌瘤阳性或阴性。现在这个方法多好多好。另外，本实验还观察了一些其他指标，等等 这文章跟麻醉有什么关系 表型电池
患者使用有效的自我报告来完成术前分型。主要措施是2011纤维肌痛调查标准。纤维肌痛的调查由痛苦的身体评估采用密歇根身体地图的数量（0至19）和伴发症状，如疲劳、麻烦的思想，并采用症状严重程度指数评估头痛（0到12）。因此，总的纤维肌痛的得分范围从0到31。测量了信度、收敛效度和判别效度。以前的分割点已被描述为“对一个人纤维肌痛积极”；然而，连续得分进行研究分析。额外的表型包括疼痛程度（简明疼痛量表；0到10的综合得分采用平均，平均最少，最差的，和现在的整体身体疼痛和痛苦；手术部位疼痛；疼痛评估分别）描述符（疼痛检测），焦虑和抑郁（医院焦虑抑郁量表）、灾难（应对策略问卷）。从术前记录治疗单打印出来并进行了患者的研究助理。所有的药物管理的需要等详细区分不同的模式以确保使用阿片类药物的能力（例如，区分患者采用每周每天三人谁需要一氢可酮）。每日平均阿片类物质消耗量被转换为24小时口服吗啡当量。阿片类药物的麻醉组术前及术中进行转换变为协变量，人口统计，身体质量指数，和美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）体力状况评分分别从电子医疗记录收集（中心性；通用电气医疗保健，美国）。因为所有的患者一般麻醉，麻醉方法的评估。手术方法被记录为阴道，腹腔镜，机器人，或开放。
页:
[1]