Objective:
After attending this case, the participants will be able to:
1. Understand the circulatory changes associated with intraoperative acute massive pulmonary embolism.
2. Learn the diagnosis modalities for intraoperative pulmonary embolism.
3. Understand the optimal hemodynamic management, the vasopressors and fluids to maximize the survival possibility.
4. Discuss other treatment options and prevention strategy.
Stem Case:
A 77 years old white female fell 3 days ago and was scheduled for left humeral open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and left hip replacement.
PMH: hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism.
SH: living with dementia husband, active and golfing regularly. Nonsmoker.
PE (in ER): BP126/63, HR67, RR22, T95.3, SaO298% in room air.
X-ray remarks: 1) complex humeral head and neck fracture with anterior displacement, and 2) mild displaced left femoral neck fracture.
Labs: HH 13.4/38.9, Platelet 309; electrolytes were normal, Glucose 194. EKG: SR 80, borderline LAD (left axis deviation). Stress echocardiogram was negative in 1997.
Disposition: the patient was admitted to orthopedic floor, continuing her chronic medications, and heparin 5000 u was started, sc bid.
On the day of surgery, a left interscalene brachial plexus catheter and a lumbar plexus block were performed with total of 0.5% bupivacaine 55 ml for postoperative analgesia. General anesthesia was induced by iv propofol (100 mg), fentanyl (150 mcg), and rocuronium (50 mg). The patient’s intubation (7.0 ETT) was confirmed by ETCO2 and equal bilateral breath sounds, and maintained with 0.5% isoflurane in O2/air. Shortly after induction, her blood pressure was trending down to 80/45 mmHg, no changes in heart rate and SaO2, which responded to ephedrine (10 mg) and phenylephrine (120 mcg), then iv hetastarch 500 ml was started.
•
Is this common in elderly patient?
•
What could be the differential diagnosis?
As planned preoperatively, a 2nd iv and a radial arterial line were placed, the patient was moved from stretcher to OR table, turned to right lateral position (20 min later). Arterial BP was again decreased to 75/40 mmHg with HR 95. This time, it did not respond to ephedrine (35 mg) and phenylephrine (600 mcg). The resident was watching the vital signs, noticed SaO2 was 80% with an ill looking ETCO2 waveform (22-27 mmHg). Immediately gave epinephrine (100 mcg, iv) and started hand bagging with 100% O2…
•
What would be the differential diagnosis again?
•
Which therapy should be initiated?
Breath sounds and ETT position were re-checked, a chest x-ray ordered immediately, and TEE called. Meanwhile, the patient was turned to a supine position and started neophenylephrine and epinephrine infusion, with both iv fluids wide open. MAP was kept >60 mmHg so as SaO2>90%, but no improvement of ETCO2 waveform.
•
What would be the findings from TEE?
TEE showed a significant dilated right atrium and ventricle with decreased contractility (sluggish or hypokinesia), a rather small LV chamber with good contractility (EF 55%), and deviated sepetal wall towards left, moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation and evident a frail mitral valve prolapsed. Surprisingly, a patent PFO with left to right shunting was found. There was an estimated pulmonary hypertension (~55 mmHg), but no visible clot.
•
Do you consider the TEE findings supportive for the diagnosis of PE?
•
Was this also possible of acute right heart infarction?
•
If TEE were not available, how could ABG, CXR, EKG, PAC, and CVP help for diagnosis?
In next 75 min of continuing resuscitation, the patient’s condition was relatively stabilized, with PaO2>110 mmHg and MAP in range of 70-85 mmHg. Troponin was negative in 2 measurements. EKG later showed junctional tachyarrhythmia (110/min), low voltage QRS (suggesting new pulmonary disease), and new abnormality of nonspecific ST and T changes. At this point, a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) was made, the original surgery was canceled and the patient was transported to ICU for continue resuscitation and treatments... Discussion: 1.Risk factors for PE and the differential diagnosis for hypoxia: Bone fracture and bed resting is the most common cause of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) formation in the low extremities, which has a potential risk of PE when the clot dislodged. The differential diagnosis includes fat embolism syndrome (FES) which is manifested by continues release fatty tissue causing pulmonary vasculature inflammatory responses. Others included pneumothorax, tension pneumothorax from multi-rib fracture or interscalene block, pulmonary contusion, endobronchial intubation, anaphylactic reaction to drugs or latex. All of these could cause sudden unstable hemodynamic and hypoxia, and should be rapidly ruled out for effective management.
2.The value of TEE in diagnosis and treatment of PE: a massive PE causes the right ventricle outflow obstruction by its mass and/or inflammatory reaction, results in severe decrease of preload and afterload (hypotension and left heart failure), severe pulmonary hypertension and right ventricle failure, and compromising coronary perfusion; these changes could be instantly characteristically revealed by TEE as dilated right ventricle with impaired contractility and small left chamber volume with preserved function initially. In addition, it may show some unknown preexisting cardiac anomaly, as the finding of a patent PFO with right to left shunt in this patient. The presence of visible clot in the pulmonary arterial confirms the PE diagnosis immediately. TEE is helpful in guiding resuscitation and providing immediately feedbacks concerning the treatments.
3.ACLS (Advance Cardiac Life Support) for managing cardiovascular collapse: When encountered such a scenario, the first is checking the airway to ensure a patent airway (intubation and ventilation with 100% oxygen). The administration of inotropics and volume are aimed to rapidly restore the patient’s cardiovascular function. Two-thirds of the mortality following massive PE occurs within one hour of the onset of hemodynamic instability. Generally, there is no rule regarding the dose range (mcg to mg), drug choice (ephedrine, phenylephrine, epinephrine, or norepinephrine), rather how faster and effectively bring the MAP back to baseline. There is no evidence of the value of steroid (dexamethasone). CPR should be initiated if no response to inotropics in 3-5 min or the presence of PEA (puleless electrical activity). Defibrillation should be delivered immediately if presence of ventricle tachycardia or fibrillation.
4.Prevention and treatment options: the stabilization and fixation of long bone fractures should take place within 72 hrs, the patient should be resuming ambulation early, starting anticoagulation(subcutaneous heparin or lovenox), placing low extremity compression cuff or/and the inferior vena cava filter; all these measures have been shown some effectiveness in decreasing DVT. The definitive emergency treatment is aimed to remove the clot and restore the cardiovascular stability. Medically, thrombolytic therapy is started with administration of thromboplastin activator (tPA) in adjunction with heparinization. Surgically, embolectomy is achieved by extracting the clot through thoracotomy or interventional radiological procedures. Numerous reports showed an immediate ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) could be life saving and create an opportunity for definitive therapy.