新青年麻醉论坛

 找回密码
 会员注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

快捷登录

搜索
热搜: 麻醉 视频 中级
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: GoalYou
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[期刊导读] 【精华】Anesthesiology,A&A 摘要翻译

  [复制链接]
16#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-19 18:55:46 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 GoalYou 于 2013-1-19 18:58 编辑

【第351篇】多巴胺——促进全身麻醉苏醒的药物

注:第365篇的Editorial Views


Dopamine-enhancing Medications to Accelerate Emergence from General Anesthesia

Benveniste, Helene M.D., Ph.D.*; Volkow, Nora D. M.D.?

Dopaminergic neurotransmission is prominently implicated in emergence from the minimal conscious state,1,2 general anesthesia,3 and in sleep–wake regulation.4 The molecular mechanisms for these effects are still incompletely understood. The anatomical and neurochemical signatures of the dopamine (DA) system for arousal under conditions of general anesthesia are clinically important to understand. First, from a clinical point of view, accurate knowledge of the molecular basis for emergence from general anesthetics with agents for which no specific antagonists exists (i.e., inhalational agents) and for other anesthetic regimens could lead to the development of a range of new drugs specifically designed for rapid emergence. Such therapeutics could perhaps be useful in the future for routine anesthesia practice. For example, rapid arousal of elderly patients undergoing surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia may prove valuable for reducing cognitive dysfunction and/or early delirium postoperatively. Second, a better understanding of the neuronal mechanisms by which DA increases the emergence from anesthesia will also help in the management of patients with DA abnormalities as may be the case for patients with Parkinson disease, schizophrenic patients treated with depot neuroleptics (long-acting dopamine-2 receptor [D2R] antagonists) and drug abusers.

In this issue of ANESTHESIOLOGY, Taylor et al.5 report that the dopamine-1 receptor (D1R) agonist 6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide but not the D2R agonist quinpirole reduces the time to emergence from isoflurane anesthesia in rats by 85% compared with placebo. The authors conclude that selective activation of D1Rs is sufficient to induce emergence from isoflurane general anesthesia and that D2Rs are not needed.5 These new data in the setting of isoflurane anesthesia are intriguing and supplement older data reporting similar findings with phenobarbital anesthesia.6,7 Specifically, Horita et al.7 investigated the effects of a D1R agonist (1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol) and a D2R antagonist (raclopride) on duration of phenobarbital anesthesia in rats (administered only 20 min after induction with 40 mg/kg intraperitoneal phenobarbital to reduce pharmacokinetic effects on emergence). They documented that the D1R agonist reduced the time to emergence by approximately 30% and found that this effect could be abolished by a D1R antagonist.7 However, in contrast to the current study,5 Horita et al.7 reported that the D2R antagonist raclopride and atropine also reversed the effect of the D1R agonist. Thus, the findings of Horita et al. suggest that the arousing effects of D1R agonists require the coactivation of these two receptors (D1R and D2R). Interestingly, although nonsignificant, the study by Taylor et al.5 showed decreases in the time from emergence of anesthesia in the rats treated with the D2R agonist quinpirole (from 330 to 189 s) and had their sample (n = 6) been larger, this effect may have been significant. Regardless, it is clear that the effects of the D1R agonist was stronger than that of the D2R agonist (quinpirole), which could reflect in part its effects on D2R autoreceptors that would lead to a decrease in DA release. In the previous study, Horita et al.7 also provide evidence that the dopaminergic effects (driven by D1R but presumably requiring background D2R tone) are mediated by downstream cholinergic effects (because these effects were blocked by atropine). In the context of the importance of D2Rs, Solt et al.3 reported that droperidol (a potent D2 antagonist) abolished the ability of the DA-enhancing drug methylphenidate to accelerate emergence in rats anesthetized with isoflurane, which also strongly suggests that D2Rs are important for anesthesia emergence.

Another intriguing question is which brain pathways mediate the effects of DA in emergence from anesthesia. In general, studies on DA networks have focused mostly on pathways involved with movement (mesostriatal), reward (mesoaccumbens), and cognition (mesocortical), and much less is known about the DA pathways implicated in arousal. Although it is plausible that some or all of these DA pathways participate in arousal, it is also likely that DA mediates its arousing effects through additional brain-wide systems. For example, the orexin/hypocretin lateral hypothalamic nucleus, which mediates arousal and is implicated in narcolepsy, is modulated by both D1R and D2R.8,9 Similarly, the tuberomammillary nucleus, which is involved in the control of wakefulness, signals not only through histamine receptors but also through D1R and D2R.10 In addition, as discussed by Taylor et al.,5 DA neurons in the ventral periaqueductal gray could mediate the effects of DA on the emergence from anesthesia.11 Finally, it is also possible that DA mediates its effects on arousal via thalamic activation.12

Over the past decades, scientists have studied the DA system’s role in cognition, motor behavior, and reward and its disruption in neuropsychiatric diseases. The data of Taylor et al.5 and that of others now highlight the importance of DA in arousal. These findings have direct clinical implications for the practice of anesthesia for they may help direct the development of new medications to accelerate the emergence from anesthesia.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
多巴胺——促进全身麻醉苏醒的药物

多巴胺能神经元与最低意识状态的苏醒、全身麻醉的苏醒以及睡眠-觉醒的调节密切相关。这些作用相关的分子机制还未完全被阐明。了解全麻状态下促进觉醒的多巴胺系统的解剖和神经化学特征十分重要。首先,从临床上看,一些全麻药物没有相应的拮抗剂(例如:吸入麻醉药),了解这些药物和其他麻醉药物全麻苏醒过程精确的分子机制可引领一大批加速苏醒的药物的开发。这些药物可能在将来日常临床工作中发挥作用。例如,老年患者需要全麻手术时,快速苏醒可能会减少术后认知功能障碍和/或早期瞻望。其次,了解多巴胺促进全麻苏醒的神经机制将对多巴胺系统功能异常患者(例如:帕金森病患者、接受镇静剂(长效多巴胺受体-2拮抗剂)治疗的精神分裂患者)以及药物滥用患者的麻醉管理有帮助。

在这一期《Anesthesiology》中,Taylor等人报道多巴胺-1受体(D1R)激动剂(6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy -3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide)可缩短异氟烷全身麻醉大鼠85%苏醒时间,而D2R激动剂(quinpirole)则不能。文中总结时标明,选择性激动D1R足够促进异氟烷全身麻醉苏醒,而不需要D2R受体参与。这些新的结果十分吸引人,而且对既往有关苯巴比妥麻醉苏醒研究的报道进行补充。Horita等人研究了D1R受体激动剂(1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzaze-pine-7,8-diol)和D2R受体拮抗剂(raclopride)在苯巴比妥麻醉大鼠中的作用(在40mg/kg 苯巴比妥腹腔麻醉后20min 进行注射以减少药代动力学效应对觉醒的影响)。他们的研究表明D1R受体激动剂大约可减少30%苏醒时间,而且该作用能够被D1R受体拮抗剂所抵消。然而,与本期文章不同的是,Horita等人报道D2R受体拮抗剂raclopride和aropine同样能够逆转D1R受体激动剂的作用。因此,Horita等人的研究表明D1R受体激动剂促进觉醒的作用需要D1R和D2R的共同作用。有趣的是,尽管作用不显著,Taylor等人的研究表明D2R受体激动剂quinpirole同样能够减少异氟烷全身麻醉的苏醒时间(从330s到189s),而且如果样本量更大一些(n=6),该作用也许更加显著。不管怎样,很明确的是D1R受体激动剂比D2R受体激动剂(quinpirole)具有更强的作用,D2R受体激动剂可能通过作用于D2R自受体导致多巴胺释放减少发挥部分作用。在之前的研究中,Horita等人表明多巴胺能的作用(由D1R受体发挥主要作用,但同时需要D2R的存在)是通过下游的胆碱能递质进行调节(因为这些作用可以被阿托品拮抗)。Solt等人报道,droperidol(一个很强的D2受体拮抗剂)可抑制促进多巴胺释放的药物哌醋甲酯促进异氟烷全身麻醉大鼠的苏醒作用,这同样表明D2R在全麻苏醒中发挥重要作用。

另外一个有趣的问题是,哪些中枢神经系统通路在多巴胺促进麻醉苏醒中发挥作用。通常情况下,有关多巴胺网络的研究集中于运动(mesostriatal亚群)、奖赏(mesoaccumbens亚群)和认知(mesocortical亚群),而关于多巴胺在觉醒中的作用知之甚少。尽管,或许部分或者全部这些通路都与觉醒相关,但是多巴胺递质可能通过中枢神经系统其它的通路发挥作用。例如,可促进苏醒,并且与嗜睡相关的外侧下丘脑分泌食欲素的神经核团可被D1R和D2R受体调节。同样,控制觉醒的结节乳头核不仅与组胺受体相关,而且受D1R和D2R受体调节。此外,同Taylor等人讨论的一样,腹侧中脑导水管周围灰质的多巴胺神经元可能介导多巴胺促进麻醉苏醒的作用。最后,多巴胺可能通过激活丘脑发挥其促进觉醒的作用。

在过去十几年,科学家们已经对多巴胺系统在认知、运动和奖赏以及其在中枢神经系统疾病中的作用进行研究。Taylor等人以及其他人的研究结果强调了多巴胺在觉醒中的作用。这些发现能够对日常麻醉工作具有直接临床意义,并且可能直接促进加速麻醉苏醒药物的开发。

Editorial Views Dopamine_enhancing_Medications_to_Accelerate.6.pdf

230.65 KB, 下载次数: 12

abbr_4501b9fd06c9cfeb47fe70d66e0fbc59.pdf

439.23 KB, 下载次数: 7

评分

1

查看全部评分

友情提示:转载请注意注明作者和出处!!

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

17#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-20 21:22:44 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 GoalYou 于 2013-1-20 21:23 编辑

【第350篇】硬膜外间断注射与硬膜外持续泵注麻醉药物用于分娩镇痛的比较:系统综述和meta分析Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):133-44.

Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS.

FRCPC, Department of Women and Obstetric Anesthesia, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, 5850/5980 University Avenue, PO Box 9700, Halifax, NS, Canada B3K 6R8. [email protected].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current standard labor epidural analgesic regimens consist of a local anesthetic in combination with an opioid delivered via continuous epidural infusion (CEI). With CEI local anesthetic, doses may be large with resulting profound motor blockade potentially affecting the incidence of instrumental deliveries. In this systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we compared the effect of intermittent epidural bolus (IEB) to standard CEI dosing with or without patient-controlled epidural analgesia on patient satisfaction, the need for manual anesthesia interventions, labor progression, and mode of delivery in healthy women receiving labor epidural analgesia.

METHODS: A systematic review of RCTs that compared CEI with IEB for labor analgesia was performed. The articles were evaluated for validity, and data were extracted by the authors and summarized using odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS: Nine RCTs were included in this systematic review. Three hundred forty-four subjects received CEI, whereas 350 subjects received IEB labor analgesia. All 9 studies were deemed to be low risk of bias. There was no statistical difference detected between IEB and CEI in the rate of cesarean delivery (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.56-1.35), duration of labor (MD, -17 minutes; 95% CI, -42 to 7), or the need for anesthetic intervention (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.29-1.06). IEB did result in a small but statistically significant reduction in local anesthetic usage (MD, -1.2 mg bupivacaine equivalent per hour; 95% CI, -2.2 to -0.3). Maternal satisfaction score (100-mm visual analog scale) was higher with IEB (MD, 7.0 mm; 95% CI, 6.2-7.8).

CONCLUSIONS: IEB is an appealing concept; current evidence suggests IEB slightly reduces local anesthetic usage and improves maternal satisfaction. Given the wide CIs of the pooled results for many outcomes, definite conclusions cannot be drawn for those outcomes, but there is also a potential that IEB improves instrumental delivery rate and need of anesthesia interventions. More study is required to conceptualize the ideal IEB regimen and investigate its effect on labor analgesia and obstetric outcomes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

硬膜外间断注射与硬膜外持续泵注麻醉药物用于分娩镇痛的比较:系统综述和meta分析

背景: 目前标准的硬膜外分娩镇痛是通过硬膜外持续泵入(CEI)由局麻药和阿片类药物混合组成的麻醉药物。通过持续硬膜外泵入局麻药,剂量通常很大,可导致显著的运动阻滞可能增加工具辅助分娩的发生率。本文对相关的RCT进行系统综述,对硬膜外间断注射(IEB)与标准的硬膜外持续泵注(患者自控镇痛或非患者自控镇痛)用于接受硬膜外分娩镇痛的健康妇在产妇满意度、麻醉干预、产程以及分娩方式方面进行比较。

方法: 系统回顾有关CEI和IEB用于分娩镇痛的RCT。分析相关文章的有效性,提取相关数据并通过OR、MD以及95 CI 进行分析总结。

结果: 在本综述中共包括9篇RCT。344产妇接受CEI分娩镇痛,350产妇接受IEB分娩镇痛。所有9篇文章均为低风险偏倚。两组在剖宫产率(OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.56-1.35)、产程(MD, -17 min; 95% CI, -42 to 7)或需要麻醉干预(OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.29-1.06)方面差距没有统计学意义。IEB确实能够少量但具有统计学差异地减少局麻药的使用(MD, 等效 -1.2 mg 布比卡因/时 ; 95% CI, -2.2 to -0.3)。IEB组产妇满意评分(100 mm 视觉模拟评分)更高 (MD, 7.0 mm; 95% CI, 6.2-7.8)。

结论: 间断硬膜外注射是一个吸引人的概念;目前的证据表明IEB轻微减少局麻药的使用,改善产妇满意度。由于一些结局的结果可信区间较宽,因此无法对那些结果下定结论,但是,仍有可能IEB改善器械辅助麻醉的使用率以及需要麻醉干预的情况。需要更多的研究来探讨IEB用于分娩镇痛的效果以及飞分娩结局的影响。

注:全文PDF超过2M,论坛不让上传,有需要联系。

活动公告:做任务得积分和权限(新手奖励计划) (←点击查看详情)

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

18#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-20 21:24:28 | 只看该作者



    什么意思?需要帮忙翻译?

 友情提示:论坛资源下载与分享的详细说明  (←点击查看详情

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

19#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-21 21:24:52 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 GoalYou 于 2013-1-21 21:27 编辑

【第349篇】发育早期暴露于挥发性麻醉药导致秀丽隐杆线虫行为缺陷 Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):185-9.

Early Developmental Exposure to Volatile Anesthetics Causes Behavioral Defects in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Gentry KR, Steele LM, Sedensky MM, Morgan PG.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, M/S W 9824, PO Box 5371, Seattle, WA 98105. [email protected].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence from animal studies shows that anesthetic exposure in early life leads to apoptosis in the developing nervous system. This loss of neurons has functional consequences in adulthood. Clinical retrospective reviews have suggested that multiple anesthetic exposures in early childhood are associated with learning disabilities later in life as well. Despite much concern about this phenomenon, little is known about the mechanism by which anesthetics initiate neuronal cell death. Caenorhabditis elegans, a powerful genetic animal model, with precisely characterized neural development and cell death pathways, affords an excellent opportunity to study anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity. We hypothesized that exposing the nematode to volatile anesthetics early in life would induce neuron cell death, producing a behavioral defect that would be manifested in adulthood.

METHODS: After synchronization and hatching, larval worms were exposed to volatile anesthetics at their 95% effective concentration for 4 hours. On day 4 of life, exposed and control worms were tested for their ability to sense and move to an attractant (i.e., to chemotax). We determined the rate of successful chemotaxis using a standardized chemotaxis index.

RESULTS: Wild-type nematodes demonstrated striking deficits in chemotaxis indices after exposure to isoflurane (ISO) or sevoflurane (SEVO) in the first larval stage (chemotaxis index: untreated, 85 ± 2; ISO, 52 ± 2; SEVO, 47 ± 2; P < 0.05 for both exposures). The mitochondrial mutant gas-1 had a heightened effect from the anesthetic exposure (chemotaxis index: untreated, 71 ± 2; ISO, 29 ± 12; SEVO, 24 ± 13; P < 0.05 for both exposures). In contrast, animals unable to undergo apoptosis because of a mutation in the pathway that mediates programmed cell death (ced-3) retained their ability to sense and move toward an attractant (chemotaxis index: untreated, 76 ± 10; ISO, 73 ± 9; SEVO, 76 ± 10). Furthermore, we discovered that the window of greatest susceptibility to anesthetic neurotoxicity in nematodes occurs in the first larval stage after hatching (L1). This coincides with a period of neurogenesis in this model. All values are means ± SD.

CONCLUSION: These data indicate that anesthetics affect neurobehavior in nematodes, extending the range of phyla in which early exposure to volatile anesthetics has been shown to cause functional neurological deficits. This implies that anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity occurs via an ancient underlying mechanism. C elegans is a tractable model organism with which to survey an entire genome for molecules that mediate the toxic effects of volatile anesthetics on the developing nervous system.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

发育早期暴露于挥发性麻醉药导致秀丽隐杆线虫行为缺陷


背景: 众多动物研究的证据表明,生命早期暴露于麻醉药物可导致发育过程神经元凋亡。这些神经元丢失可导致成年后功能异常。回顾性临床研究表明儿童早期多次暴露于麻醉药物与其随后的学习障碍相关。尽管该现象得到众多关注,但是人们对麻醉药物导致神经元死亡的机制却知之甚少。秀丽隐杆线虫是一种很好的基因动物模型,其神经系统发育和细胞死亡通路具有明确的特征,为研究麻醉药物的神经毒性提供良好的机遇。我们假设线虫在生命早期暴露于挥发性气体可引起神经元死亡,导致成年后表现出行为异常。

方法: 在同步化孵化后,幼虫暴露于95%有效浓度的挥发性麻醉药物中4小时。在生命周期的第4天,检测暴露组和对照组对引诱剂的感知和运动能力(例如,趋化作用)。我们通过标准趋化指数来评价成功趋化的比例。

结果: 野生型线虫在幼虫第1阶段暴露于异氟烷(ISO)或七氟烷(SEVO)后导致显著的趋化障碍(趋化指数:未暴露,85 ± 2;ISO, 52 ± 2;SEVO, 47 ± 2;异氟烷和七氟烷组P值均小于0.05)。线粒体gas-1基因突变对麻醉药物暴露效应具有显著作用(趋化指数:未暴露,71 ± 2;ISO,29 ± 12;SEVO, 24 ± 13;异氟烷和七氟烷组P值均小于0.05)。相反,由于介导细胞程序死亡通路发生突变可使其保留对引诱剂的感知和运动能力感知和运动,因此动物不会发生神经元凋亡(趋化指数: 未暴露, 76 ± 10;ISO, 73 ± 9;SEVO,76 ± 10)。而且,我们发现线虫对麻醉药物最敏感的时间段是孵化后第1个幼虫期。这与该模型神经发育的时间相一致。所有结果有均数± 标准差表示。

结论: 这些结果表明麻醉药物能够影响线虫的神经行为,扩大了麻醉药物早期暴露导致神经功能异常的动物类属。这表明麻醉药物的神经毒性通过古老存在的机制发挥作用。秀丽隐杆线虫是一个容易处理的动物模型,可用于研究挥发性麻醉药对发育中神经系统毒性作用完整基因分子机制。

abbr_9c591375982701203477085b518745c1.pdf

586.45 KB, 下载次数: 39

评分

1

查看全部评分

友情提示:转载请注意注明作者和出处!!

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

20#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-22 21:45:28 | 只看该作者
【第348篇】有关新鲜冰冻血浆/红细胞比值在产后大出血中作用的观察性研究 Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):155-61.

An observational study of the fresh frozen plasma: red blood cell ratio in postpartum hemorrhage.


Pasquier P, Gayat E, Rackelboom T, La Rosa J, Tashkandi A, Tesniere A, Ravinet J, Vincent JL, Tsatsaris V, Ozier Y, Goffinet F, Mignon A.

Bégin Military Teaching Hospital, 69 avenue de Paris 94163 Saint-Mandé Cedex, France. [email protected].

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal death worldwide. Recent data from trauma patients and patients with hemorrhagic shock have suggested that an increased fresh frozen plasma:red blood cell (FFP:RBC) ratio may be of benefit in massive bleeding. We addressed this issue in cases of severe postpartum hemorrhage.

METHODS: We reviewed data from all patients diagnosed with severe postpartum hemorrhage during a 4-year period (2006-2009). Patients who were treated with sulprostone and required transfusion within 6 hours of delivery were included in the study and were divided into 2 groups according to their response to sulprostone: bleeding controlled with sulprostone alone (sulprostone group) and bleeding requiring an additional advanced interventional procedure including arterial angiographic embolization and/or surgical procedures (arterial ligation, B-Lynch suture, or hysterectomy; intervention group). The requirement or no requirement for advanced procedures constituted the primary end point of the study. Propensity scoring was used to assess the effect of a high FFP:RBC ratio on bleeding control.

RESULTS: Among 12,226 deliveries during the study period, 142 (1.1%) were complicated by severe postpartum hemorrhage. Bleeding was controlled with sulprostone alone in 90 patients (63%). Advanced interventional procedures were required for 52 patients (37%). Forty-one patients were transfused with both RBCs and FFP. The FFP:RBC ratio increased over the study period (P < 0.001), from 1:1.8 at the start to 1:1.1 at the end of the study period. After propensity score modeling (inverse probability of treatment weighting), a high FFP:RBC ratio was associated with lower odds for advanced interventional procedures (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.25 [1.07-1.47]; P = 0.008). There were no deaths, severe organ dysfunction, or other complications as a consequence of severe postpartum hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, a higher FFP:RBC ratio was associated with a lower requirement for advanced interventional procedures in the setting of postpartum hemorrhage. The benefits of transfusion using a higher FFP:RBC ratio should be confirmed by randomized-controlled trials.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

有关新鲜冰冻血浆/红细胞比值在产后大出血中作用的观察性研究

摘要

背景: 在世界范围内,产后大出血均是产妇死亡最主要的原因。最近有关创伤患者和失血性休克患者的研究结果表明提高新鲜冰冻血浆:红细胞比率可能对大出血患者有利。我们对产后严重出血的情况进行相关研究。

方法: 我们回顾4年内(2006年-2009年)所有被诊断为严重产后出血患者的数据。患者产后6小时内需要噻普酮治疗和需要输血的患者纳入研究,并且根据其对噻普酮的反应分为两组:单独噻普酮可控制的出血(噻普酮组)和需要动脉血管栓塞和/或手术(动脉结扎、B-lynch缝扎术或子宫切除术)等进一步干预措施治疗的患者(干预组)。是否需要进一步干预作为该研究最主要的研究终点。倾向评分用于评价高FFP:RBC比值在控制出血中的作用。

结果: 研究期间共有12226产妇分娩,142例(1.1%)出现严重产后出血并发症。90位患者通过单独应用噻普酮可控制出血(63%)。52位患者需要进一步措施进行干预(37%)。41位患者同时输注红细胞和新鲜冰冻血浆。在研究过程期间,FFP:RBC的比值从开始的1:1.8上升到1:1.1。进行倾向评分建模(逆处理概率加权法)后发现,高FFP:RBC比值患者需要进一步干预治疗的风险小 (OR [95% CI], 1.25 [1.07-1.47]; P = 0.008)。严重产后出血未出现死亡,严重器官功能障碍或者其它并发症。

结论: 在该回顾性研究中,在产后大出血情况下,高FFP:RBC比值患者需要进一步干预治疗的风险小。以高FFP:RBC比值方式输注血制品的益处需要RCT研究进行确认。

abbr_263257df5c16cf4f6ca12f0f6cf117c8.pdf

494.94 KB, 下载次数: 73

评分

1

查看全部评分

有奖活动:我为论坛出谋划策!! ←点击查看详情

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

21#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-23 23:00:07 | 只看该作者
【第347篇】乳腺癌手术后行切口及肋间神经罗哌卡因浸润在术后慢性疼痛中的作用:一项双盲随机临床试验 Anesthesiology. 118(2):318-326, February 2013.

A Double-blind Randomized Trial of Wound and Intercostal Space Infiltration with Ropivacaine during Breast Cancer Surgery: Effects on Chronic Postoperative Pain

Albi-Feldzer, Aline M.D.*; Mouret-Fourme E, Emmanuelle M.D.?; Hamouda, Smail M.D.?; Motamed, Cyrus M.D.§; Dubois, Pierre-Yves M.D.‖; Jouanneau, Ludivine Ph.D.?; Jayr, Christian M.D., Ph.D.*

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of local anesthetic wound infiltration for the treatment of acute and chronic postoperative pain is controversial and there are no detailed studies. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of ropivacaine wound infiltration on chronic pain after breast surgery.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 236 patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive ropivacaine or placebo infiltration of the wound, the second and third intercostal spaces and the humeral insertion of major pectoralis. Acute pain, analgesic consumption, nausea and vomiting were assessed every 30 min for 2 h in the postanesthesia care unit and every 6 h for 48 h. Chronic pain was evaluated 3 months, 6 months, and 1 yr after surgery by the brief pain inventory, hospital anxiety and depression, and neuropathic pain questionnaires.

Results: Ropivacaine wound infiltration significantly decreased immediate postoperative pain for the first 90 min, but did not decrease chronic pain at 3 months (primary endpoint), or at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. At 3 months, the incidence of chronic pain was 33% and 27% (P = 0.37) in the ropivacaine and placebo groups, respectively. During follow-up, brief pain inventory, neuropathic pain, and anxiety increased over time in both groups (P < 0.001) while depression remained stable. No complications occurred.

Conclusion: This multicenter, prospective study shows that ropivacaine wound infiltration after breast cancer surgery decreased immediate postoperative pain but did not decrease chronic pain at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

乳腺癌手术后行切口及肋间神经罗哌卡因浸润在术后慢性疼痛中的作用:一项双盲随机临床试验

【摘要】

背景: 切口行局麻药浸润用于治疗术后急慢性疼痛的作用仍存在争议,而且目前没有具体的研究。该研究的主要目的是评价罗哌卡因切口局部浸润用于乳腺癌术后慢性疼痛的作用。

方法: 本研究为前瞻、随机、双盲、平行组设计、安慰剂对照的临床试验,236为拟行乳腺癌手术的患者随机分为两组,在切口局部,第二、三肋间隙以及胸大肌的肱骨连接处分别接受罗哌卡因或者安慰剂浸润。在麻醉恢复室的2小时内,每30分钟评估急性疼痛,镇痛药的使用量、恶心和呕吐情况,随后48小时内每6小时再次评估上述情况。术后3个月、6个月、1年通过简易疼痛量表、医院焦虑、抑郁以及神经病理性疼痛问卷评价慢性疼痛情况。

结果: 罗哌卡因切口浸润显著降低术后90分钟内的急性疼痛,但并未减轻术后3个月、6个月及12个月的慢性疼痛。在术后3个月时,罗哌卡因组和安慰剂组慢性疼痛的发生率分别为33%和27%(P = 0.37)。在随访期间,两组简易疼痛量表评分及神经病理痛、焦虑情况随着时间推移均升高(P < 0.001),然而抑郁情况相对稳定。没有并发症发生。

结论: 该多中心前瞻性研究表明乳腺癌术后罗哌卡因切口浸润减轻术后即刻疼痛,但无法减轻术后3个月、6个月、1年疼痛。

A_Double_blind_Randomized_Trial_of_Wound_and.16.pdf

815.93 KB, 下载次数: 44

评分

1

查看全部评分

友情提示:转载请注意注明作者和出处!!

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

22#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-24 21:22:26 | 只看该作者
【第346篇】亚麻醉浓度的丙泊酚、七氟烷、瑞芬太尼和盐酸Ketamine对内脏和躯体疼痛诱发电位的作用Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):308-17.

Effects of Propofol, Sevoflurane, Remifentanil, and (S)-Ketamine in Subanesthetic Concentrations on Visceral and Somatosensory Pain-evoked Potentials.


Untergehrer G, Jordan D, Eyl S, Schneider G.

* Research Fellow, ‡ Professor, Director, and Chair, Department of Anesthesiology, Helios Clinic Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany. † Research Fellow, Department of Anesthesiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although electroencephalographic parameters and auditory evoked potentials (AEP) reflect the hypnotic component of anesthesia, there is currently no specific and mechanism-based monitoring tool for anesthesia-induced blockade of nociceptive inputs. The aim of this study was to assess visceral pain-evoked potentials (VPEP) and contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEP) as electroencephalographic indicators of drug-induced changes of visceral and somatosensory pain. Additionally, AEP and electroencephalographic permutation entropy were used to evaluate sedative components of the applied drugs.

METHODS: In a study enrolling 60 volunteers, VPEP, CHEP (amplitude N2-P1), and AEP (latency Nb, amplitude Pa-Nb) were recorded without drug application and at two subanesthetic concentration levels of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, or (s)-ketamine. Drug-induced changes of evoked potentials were analyzed. VPEP were generated by electric stimuli using bipolar electrodes positioned in the distal esophagus. For CHEP, heat pulses were given to the medial aspect of the right forearm using a CHEP stimulator. In addition to AEP, electroencephalographic permutation entropy was used to indicate level of sedation.

RESULTS: With increasing concentrations of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, and (s)-ketamine, VPEP and CHEP N2-P1 amplitudes decreased. AEP and electroencephalographic permutation entropy showed neither clinically relevant nor statistically significant suppression of cortical activity during drug application.

CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing VPEP and CHEP amplitudes under subanesthetic concentrations of propofol, sevoflurane, remifentanil, and (s)-ketamine indicate suppressive drug effects. These effects seem to be specific for analgesia.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

亚麻醉浓度的丙泊酚、七氟烷、瑞芬太尼和盐酸Ketamine对内脏和躯体疼痛诱发电位的作用


【摘要】

背景: 尽管脑电图和听觉诱发电位可反应麻醉的镇静作用,然而,目前没有特殊设备监测麻醉阻断伤害性刺激传入的情况。本研究旨在研究内脏痛诱发电位(VPEP)和热接触痛诱发电位(CHEP),如同脑电图一样,作为评价药物导致内脏和躯体疼痛改变的指标。此外,AEP和脑电图用于评估所研究药物的镇静作用。

方法: 该研究纳入60名自愿者,记录没有药物作用以及两组亚麻醉剂量丙泊酚、七氟烷、瑞芬太尼和盐酸Ketamine作用下的VPEP、CHEP和AEP。VPEP通过食管远端的双极电极产生。CHEP通过CHEP刺激器给予前臂中部热脉冲刺激产生。AEP和脑电图用于评价镇静情况。

结果: 随着丙泊酚、七氟烷、瑞芬太尼和盐酸Ketamine浓度升高,VPEP和CHEP N2-P1幅度振幅降低。AEP和脑电图结果表明药物作用未导致出现临床相关和有统计学意义差异的皮质活动度降低。

结论: 亚麻醉浓度的丙泊酚、七氟烷、瑞芬太尼和盐酸Ketamine导致VPEP和CHEP下降反应了药物的抑制作用。这些作用主要表现在镇痛方面。

abbr_7593fa98660eb7b8fec4d45d7ee8767a.pdf

640.56 KB, 下载次数: 66

评分

1

查看全部评分

 友情提示:论坛资源下载与分享的详细说明  (←点击查看详情

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

23#
发表于 2013-2-19 12:58:40 | 只看该作者
好厉害呀,我要认真学习。:victory:

 友情提示:论坛资源下载与分享的详细说明  (←点击查看详情

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

24#
发表于 2013-3-26 19:56:31 | 只看该作者
不错,认真学习中:victory:

 友情提示:论坛资源下载与分享的详细说明  (←点击查看详情

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

25#
发表于 2013-4-25 22:59:02 | 只看该作者
多谢分享,收益颇多

友情提示:转载请注意注明作者和出处!!

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

26#
发表于 2013-6-7 21:44:52 | 只看该作者
新进展,新收获,有利以后科研;P

 友情提示:论坛资源下载与分享的详细说明  (←点击查看详情

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

27#
发表于 2013-8-9 23:16:37 | 只看该作者
太厉害了:loveliness:

友情提示:转载请注意注明作者和出处!!

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

28#
发表于 2013-8-29 22:00:07 | 只看该作者
非常感谢,能不能多传一些啊?

友情提示:转载请注意注明作者和出处!!

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

29#
发表于 2013-9-29 10:26:20 | 只看该作者
让我们的思路更加开阔

有奖活动:我为论坛出谋划策!! ←点击查看详情

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

30#
发表于 2014-2-16 21:25:24 | 只看该作者
受益匪浅,希望继续能拜读到其他文章。

友情提示:转载请注意注明作者和出处!!

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报/纠错

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 会员注册

本版积分规则


论坛郑重声明 本站供网上自由讨论使用,所有个人言论并不代表本站立场,所发布资源均来源于网络,假若內容有涉及侵权,请联络我们。我们将立刻删除侵权资源,并向版权所有者致以诚挚的歉意!
收藏帖子 返回列表 联系我们 搜索 官方QQ群

QQ|关于我们|业务合作|手机版|新青年麻醉论坛 ( 浙ICP备19050841号-1 )

GMT+8, 2025-1-23 08:12 , Processed in 0.201551 second(s), 29 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表