本帖最后由 南粤麻医 于 2014-3-22 17:18 编辑
A randomised comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in infants
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.12592/abstract
Summary
We performed a randomised comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Classic™ in children aged less than a year who were undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery. Fifty-four infants were randomly allocated to either the i-gel or the LMA Classic. We measured performance characteristics, fibreoptic views through the device and complications. Success rate at first insertion attempt was 100% (27/27) in the i-gel group compared with 88% (23/26) in the LMA Classic group. Insertion of the device was considered easy in 26/27 (96%) patients in the i-gel group compared with 18/26 (69%) patients in the LMA Classic group (p = 0.009). There were no differences between the groups in insertion times, fibreoptic views through the device, airway leak pressures or complications. We conclude that the i-gel was considered easier to insert than the LMA Classic in infants.
该研究对比i-gel™喉罩与LMA经典喉罩用于婴儿呼吸道维持的效果，观察其1岁内患儿择期手术全麻中的使用。54例患儿随机分为两组。
i-gel™组一次插入成功率为100%，而LMA组为88%。i-gel™组96%容易置入，而LMA组为69%。置入时间、纤维支气管镜检查位置、漏气压力或并发症两组无差别。
结论认为，i-gel™用于婴儿交LMA经典喉罩具有明显优势。 | 
|关于我们|业务合作|手机版|新青年麻醉论坛
( 浙ICP备19050841号-1 )
发表于 2014-3-22 17:16:36
QQ好友和群
收藏
淘帖
鲜花
鸡蛋
提升卡
置顶卡
变色卡
楼主
